The Cost of Omission

6
13399593 - dollars

Just as an act of commission can result in harm, an act of omission can do the same. For example, if you pull out in front of a vehicle travelling at a high rate of speed, you are likely to cause an accident for which you are liable. (This is an act of commission.) On the other hand, if you neglect to include a key piece of information on an application for government benefits, you could be in big trouble with Uncle Sam. (This is an act of omission.) A press release from the Federal Bureau of Investigation details the case of a Concord woman, who omitted her husband’s annual income from multiple government benefit applications and consequently, received more than $250,000 in financial assistance from four different government programs.

The press release states that the 54-year-old falsely reported that her husband was not living in her household and did not contribute any income. What she omitted was that her husband was indeed living in her home and had an annual salary that ranged from $69,500 to $89,000. (That’s a pretty big omission.) She omitted this key information from her applications to the Social Security Administration’s Supplemental Income program, the United States Department of Housing the Urban Development’s Section 8 Housing program, the United States Department of Agriculture’s Food Stamp program and the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ Financial Assistance to Needy Families and Aid to Permanently Disabled Persons programs. (I guess she figured if she could dupe one program, why not try more?)

One thing that the fraudster did not omit in court was her guilty plea. She ‘fessed up and is now facing up to 10 years in prison, plus a fine up to $250,000. Perhaps next time, she’ll fill in the blank with the correct and honest answer, instead of paying a high cost for omission because she didn’t do the right thing in the first place.

Source: Today’s ”Fraud of the Day” is based on a press release titled, ”Concord Resident Pleads Guilty to Multiple Fraud Charges,” released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on October 17, 2013.

CONCORD, NH—Betty Dugan, 54, of Concord, New Hampshire, has pled guilty in United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire to charges that she knowingly used false information to obtain benefits from government programs that are solely intended to provide financial assistance to impoverished individuals and families, announced United States Attorney John P. Kacavas.

From January 2003 to April 2012, Dugan received benefits totaling more than $250,000 from the Social Security Administration’s Supplemental Income program, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Section 8 Housing program, the United States Department of Agriculture’s Food Stamp program, and the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ Financial Assistance to Needy Families and Aid to Permanently Disabled Persons programs.

 

Read More

SHARE
Previous articlePreventing Homestead Fraud in the Sunshine State
Next articlePromises
Larry Benson
Larry Benson is currently the Director of Strategic Alliances for Revenue Discovery and Recovery at LexisNexis Risk Solutions. In this role, Benson is responsible for developing partnerships for the tax and revenue and child support enforcement verticals. He focuses on embedded companies that have a need for third-party analytics to enhance their current offerings.