To Take or Not to Take Responsibility

5
43132461 - close-up of person hands using stamper on document with the text approved

When a defendant enters an Alford Plea, it means that there is not an admission of guilt. Even though the person entering the plea maintains his or her innocence, the court treats the plea as if it were a ”guilty” plea. (Confused yet?) An article posted on CentralMaine.com tells the story of a man and wife who entered an Alford Plea after being caught stealing more than $39,000 from multiple state benefit programs.

The article states that after the couple married, the woman applied for state assistance because the husband left her and was living homeless in his van. Over a period of five years, property owners and landlords testified that the couple was actually living in a mobile home together. During that time, the husband also reported that he was living in a renovated garage, not with his wife. (At least he supposedly had a place to park his van, and he was no longer homeless.)

In addition to lying about their living arrangements, the couple failed to report to the Department of Health and Human Services that they both had a steady job of delivering a local newspaper. (Apparently, investigators discovered that the couple also received $39,161 in undeserved welfare benefits from food stamps, the state health care program and a home energy assistance program.)

The man and wife both pleaded guilty to charges of unsworn falsification and two counts of theft by deception under the Alford doctrine. The judge sentenced the 60-year-old man and his 59-year-old wife to two years in prison. They ended up getting all but 30 days of the sentence suspended plus two years of probation and a total of $36,000 in restitution. They only have to pay at least $5 a month toward that total bill. (At that rate, it will take 600 years to pay off their debt. What’s the point?)

Whether they think they are guilty of the crime or not, I think it’s pretty easy to see that these two fraudsters are have some issues with accepting responsibility for their actions. By lying to the government, their deceit and selfish actions prevented those who qualify for government benefits program from receiving the assistance they deserve.

Source: Today’s ”Fraud of the Day” is based on an article titled, ”Augusta Couple, Whitefield Woman Sentenced for Welfare Fraud,” written by Craig Crosby and posted on CentralMaine.com on February 9, 2015.

AUGUSTA — Three people on Monday were given jail sentences for their schemes to steal money from state welfare programs.

Walter Trask, 60, and his wife, 59-year-old Kathryn Trask, both of Augusta, were each sentenced to two years in prison with all but 30 days suspended and two years’ probation for receiving more than $39,000 in state aid for which they were ineligible. Justice Andrew Horton, who imposed the sentence, also ordered each of the Trasks to pay $18,000 in restitution, or a total of $36,000. The Trasks were ordered to pay at least $5 per month toward that total.

Read More

SHARE
Previous articleStranded by Fraud
Next articleFraud at First Sight
Larry Benson
Larry Benson is currently the Director of Strategic Alliances for Revenue Discovery and Recovery at LexisNexis Risk Solutions. In this role, Benson is responsible for developing partnerships for the tax and revenue and child support enforcement verticals. He focuses on embedded companies that have a need for third-party analytics to enhance their current offerings.