To Tell the Truth

3

For many years, American taxpayers have been concerned that the Social Security Administration (SSA) will not have enough money to pay out benefits at retirement; yet, the agency continues to pay millions of dollars to people who are no longer alive. According to The Daily Progress, results of a 2011 study showed that the SSA distributed almost $99 million to deceased beneficiaries. Many of the erroneous payments are a result of computer system errors, but sometimes family members intentionally neglect to report their loved one’s death with the motive of collecting the monthly benefits check. (Shocking, I know.) When this occurs, an act of fraud is committed – such as in the case of a Virginia woman, who continued to collect Social Security benefits for four-and-a-half years after her mother died.

No one knows for sure what makes someone commit fraud, but money is usually the motive. Hard economic times can motivate even the most honest of people to do things they wouldn’t normally do. The article states that the Virginia resident spent almost $70,000 of her mother’s Social Security benefits without ever signing a check. Most of the funds were used to maintain her home, which she has subsequently sold to repay the government.

What makes this case – one out of 890 cited in the 2011 study – unique is that the perpetrator cooperated from the outset of the investigation. Her acceptance of responsibility for the fraudulent act, coupled with a non-existent prior criminal record, helped the judge to determine a lenient sentence, which required payment of a $2,000 fine and a $100 special assessment. (Do what your mother told you. Always tell the truth.)

Death records are important because they affect other federal programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps. These programs rely on the beneficiary status listed in public records, and if the data is incorrect, other federal agencies also will end up doling out erroneous payments to people who are dead. (This costs the rest of us living taxpayers a lot of money.) This sounds like a great opportunity for government agencies to use public records data to verify that the beneficiary is actually among the land of the living.

Source: Today’s ”Fraud of the Day” is based on an article titled, ”Woman Fined $2,000 in Social Security Fraud Case,” published in The Daily Progress on July 22, 2013.

CHARLOTESSVILLE – Court records show Pamela Mosley never signed Helen Burke’s name on a check, but Mosley did spend nearly $70,000 of Social Security benefits four-and-a-half years after her mother’s death.

“I have remorse and regret for my conduct and my actions,” Mosley told U.S. District Judge Norman K. Moon on Monday in Charlottesville. “It shamed and embarrassed my family, its history and lineage.”

Read More

SHARE
Previous articleBragging Rights
Next articleTime Management
Larry Benson
Larry Benson is currently the Director of Strategic Alliances for Revenue Discovery and Recovery at LexisNexis Risk Solutions. In this role, Benson is responsible for developing partnerships for the tax and revenue and child support enforcement verticals. He focuses on embedded companies that have a need for third-party analytics to enhance their current offerings.